🔗 Share this article

It has been described as one of the largest scams of its kind in the United Kingdom.

In all 14 individuals have been sentenced for their involvement in a £28 million plot to cheat more than 3,500 holiday ownership holders.

The affected individuals were desperate to terminate age-old vacation property deals and tried to find support.

The majority were aged between 60 and 80. Over 500 of them parted with over £10,000, and one handed over over £80,000.

Those affected were faced aggressive consultations lasting up to six hours. They were financially worse off, possessing useless fake "rewards" and remained bound by expensive timeshare contracts they frequently were unable to use.

The Firm Behind the Fraud

The business at the heart of the scheme was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They took clients' cash to finance the directors' lavish standard of living of exclusive education, luxury homes and private jets.

The individual at the top of the organization, Mark Rowe, was sentenced to a seven and a half year jail time in January for conspiracy to defraud.

In the latest development, his wife Nicola was among the last group to receive sentencing.

She was handed a two-year suspended prison term at Southwark Crown Court after confessing to illegal fund handling.

The outcome represents a long time coming and represents a huge win for the people who spoke out, the law enforcement and legal representatives.

The Way the Investigation Was Initiated

The first knowledge of SMT came in the summer of 2016. I was working in the reporting team of a news organization, producing documentary features.

A acquaintance noted that his mother had assumed the use of a timeshare apartment in a European resort and, after years of holidays, had started seeking to exit the contract.

It is important to recall how common vacation properties had evolved with UK travelers in the 1980s and 1990s.

Vacation properties allowed people to occupy the identical property each season, or swap their time slots with additional holders who had apartments in alternative destinations. Approximately 600,000 sun-lovers took up that opportunity.

The first timeshare rush was linked to a lot of reports about dishonest operators fraudulently marketing investments. They appeared frequently on public interest TV programmes.

The common vacation property deal locked buyers for many years.

By 2016, those investors who had used their assigned property in the sunshine for 20 or 30 years were getting older, and a significant number were hoping to end their association to their timeshares.

Several had health issues and couldn't get to their properties. A few just believed they'd got all they wanted from them. And some had passed away, in frequent situations passing on their heirs to assume the contracts - plus their yearly fees and service charges.

The Undercover Operation Unfolds

And that's where the family member had ended up. She looked online for answers and came across SMT, a business whose website claimed to terminate her contract.

Yet, having paid a fee and booked a meeting with them, her loved ones had doubts.

Further research revealed numerous individuals saying they had paid money and achieved no result in return. In fact, they had suffered financially. Substantial amounts.

The investigative unit began investigating what was occurring. It was rapidly apparent that there were dubious individuals active in the vacation property industry.

An attorney had many grievance cases waiting to sue the organization.

The team interviewed clients who had dealt with the organization and they all told the same story. They believed the firm would acquire their investment away from them but when they attended a meeting (for which they paid up front) they were informed there was no potential buyers.

Rather, they were pushed - in fact coerced - to invest additional funds investing in "Monster Rewards", named after the outfit's parent company, Monster Travel.

The nature of these rewards was not exactly clear. They seemed similar to a type of exchange medium, offering reduced-price holidays and services and retail offers.

And they were apparently "tradable" with additional holders, some time down the line.

Committing funds immediately would produce an future return that would offset the company's charges and result in the timeshare holder with a gain, freed at last from their pesky contract.

An unrealistic promise? Certainly, that proved correct.

A 'Misleading Tactic'

Assuming these reports were accurate, this was a major deception.

The technique is termed a "bait-and-switch."

A business - in this case the organization - "attracts the client by promoting a specific service and then claim it is unavailable, directing the individual towards a different, lower-quality offering.

This is against the law. Equipped with all the accounts we had gathered, we argued to secretly film one of the organization's sessions.

This takes dedication, work, and clear arguments for why this is the only way to collect the evidence required to prove wrongdoing.

With approval secured, our small team arranged a consultation with one of the organization's staff in the location.

Acting as a potential client hoping to help his mother out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement