Families' Heartache Over Shoreline Degradation Threatening Norfolk Graves
Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards
The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles
One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”
“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril
Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.
“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Seeking Solutions and Certainty
The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”
It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”
The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.